<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passing Comments &#187; polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/tag/polls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments</link>
	<description>a curious Yankee in Europe&#039;s court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(5th) Occasional U.S. news media round-up on presidential race</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/147</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/147#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mamas don&#8217;t let your babies grow up to be rock stars* Who knew that being a rock star is such a terrible thing? (President Bruce Springsteen has kind of a nice ring to it, don&#8217;t you think?) But, apparently, Republican Party nominee McCain is calculating that American voters think poorly of the rock deities, because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mamas don&#8217;t let your babies grow up to be rock stars</strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngbcsxFET68" target="_blank">*</a></p>
<p>Who knew that being a rock star is such a terrible thing? (President Bruce Springsteen has kind of a nice ring to it, don&#8217;t you think?)</p>
<p>But, apparently, Republican Party nominee McCain is calculating that American voters think poorly of the rock deities, because he&#8217;s been accusing Obama of the dark sin of being just such a super-celebrity at home and abroad.</p>
<ul>
<li>To see an example of Obama as rock star, watch this<em> New York Time</em>&#8216;s <a href="http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=01d7192bcaa8aa9604bb98542281f05d959a7754" target="_blank">video</a> overview of the candidate&#8217;s Berlin visit (&#8220;Reporter&#8217;s Notebook: Obama in Berlin&#8221; by Nicholas Kulish, July 24, 2008).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>To see an example of how McCain is trying to use the rock star label as a weapon against Obama, see this <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0808/McCain_contrasts_celeb_Obama_with_average_Americans.html" target="_blank">report</a> and a video of a McCain campaign ad on Politico.com (&#8220;McCain contrasts celeb Obama with average Americans,&#8221; Jonathan Martin blog, Aug 8, 2008).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The blonde bites back </strong></p>
<p>What do (beautiful blonde) women want? A little respect, maybe. That&#8217;s something Republican Party nominee McCain discovered recently when he took the proverbial <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/low-road" target="_blank">low road</a> in a television campaign ad in July that compared Obama to blonde popstar Britney and blonde celebrity Paris Hilton. The latter blonde instantly took aim, fired back and scored a bullseye.</p>
<p>Hilton posted her own video in which she called McCain a &#8220;wrinkly whitehaired guy.&#8221; And, according to the media reports I read, Hilton was widely declared the victor in the video shootout. See McCain&#8217;s video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHXYsw_ZDXg" target="_blank">here</a>, and the Hilton video <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/4178033806" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>How to play &#8220;Playing the Race Card&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>It was never a question that race eventually would become an issue in the current Presidential campaign, it was just a question of how &#8220;it would rear its ugly head,&#8221; according to <a href="http://www.elvinlim.com" target="_blank">Elvin Lim</a>, an Asst. Professor of Government at Wesleyan University.</p>
<p>Pointing out that &#8220;the minority candidate is always accused of playing the minority card&#8221; (in this case the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_card" target="_blank">race card</a>), Lim analyzes the strategy Republican nominee McCain is using to attack Obama on this front.</p>
<p>See Lim&#8217;s article <a href="http://blog.oup.com/2008/08/race-card/" target="_blank">here</a> (Aug 4, 2008) on the Oxford University Press blog (blog.oup.com).</p>
<p><strong>If money really talks</strong></p>
<p>Then it must have quite a bit more to declare about Obama in this campaign than it does about McCain. In July, the Obama campaign reported raising $51 million, compared to the McCain campaign&#8217;s report of taking in only $27 million for the same period (&#8220;Obama Campaign Raises Over $51 Million In July&#8221; by Beth Fouhy, AP, Aug 16, 2008). See article <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/16/obama-campaign-raises-ove_n_119331.html " target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>If the news media&#8217;s reporting of poll results drives you crazy?</strong></p>
<p>A possible antidote is the website <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/" target="_blank">fivethirtyeight.com</a>. The site offers ongoing analysis of the major U.S. political polls, and is the creation of Nate Silver, a highly reputable sports statistics analyst.</p>
<p>See a <em>Newsweek</em> article <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/140469" target="_blank">here</a> on Silver (&#8220;Making His Pitches&#8221; by Andrew Romano, Jun 16, 2008). In a crucial primary for Hillary Clinton earlier this year, Silver&#8217;s projections were more on target than those of all the established pollsters, according to <em>Newsweek</em>. The article also details how Silver goes about achieving his high level of accuracy for projections in both sports and political events.</p>
<p>The number five-thirty-eight, according to Silver, is a reference to the number of electors in the <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/about.html" target="_blank">Electoral College</a> &#8212; the U.S. Constitutional process that plays the key role in determining who will win the presidency.</p>
<p><strong>Is it truth, lies, or just politics?</strong></p>
<p>In political campaigns, the practice of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smear_campaign" target="_blank">smears and mudslinging</a> are favorite activities more often than not. To find out if these accusations are true or false, one of the best <a href="http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_561536011/go-to_guy.html" target="_blank">go-to</a> websites is <a href="http://factcheck.org/" target="_blank">factcheck.org</a>.</p>
<p>From the website&#8217;s About page:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Annenberg Political Fact Check is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. The APPC was established by publisher and philanthropist Walter Annenberg in 1994 to create a community of scholars within the University of Pennsylvania that would address public policy issues at the local, state, and federal levels.</p>
<p>The APPC accepts NO funding from business corporations, labor unions, political parties, lobbying organizations or individuals. It is funded primarily by the Annenberg Foundation.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>If wishes were horses and rock stars could be president&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Bruce Springsteen performing &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Land_Is_Your_Land" target="_blank">This Land Is Your Land</a>&#8221; at the Memorial Coliseum in LA on September 30, 1985:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1yuc4BI5NWU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1yuc4BI5NWU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">(<em>see <a href="http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/141" target="_blank">here</a> for previous round-up</em>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/147/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do elections drive the polls, or do the polls drive the elections?</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/7</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/7#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The polling industry is renown for being secretive about its methods, typically publishing only selected results from its surveys. For years, many people have voiced suspicions about the credibility of political polling &#8211; are those who do the polls truly non-partisan, are the questionnaires administered in a competent manner, who exactly is being polled, for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The polling industry is renown for being secretive about its methods, typically publishing only selected results from its surveys. For years, many people have voiced suspicions about the credibility of political polling &#8211; are those who do the polls truly non-partisan, are the questionnaires administered in a competent manner, who exactly is being polled, for example.</p>
<p>Now the skeptics have a champion, and it&#8217;s coming from the blogosphere. A group of political news organizations are turning the tables and launching an online project to scrutinize the polls themselves. Led by <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/announcing-huffposts-pol_b_73395.html" target="_blank">HuffingtonPost.com</a>, the news groups are asking their respective website visitors to participate in a survey forum about their experiences with being polled.</p>
<p>Some of the survey questions include: who called them, when, did they agree to participate, were the questions worded fairly or slanted toward a desired response? You can see the complete online poll form with all the questions <a href="http://otb.huffingtonpost.com/pollingproject/survey.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/7/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
