<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passing Comments &#187; newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/tag/newspapers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments</link>
	<description>a curious Yankee in Europe&#039;s court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:06:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Times&#8217; paywall experiment down, but is it out?</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/2328</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/2328#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/?p=2328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the paying-members-only policy recently enacted by The Times in the UK reportedly has caused online readership to plummet 90 percent (see here), it&#8217;s still too early to declare the experiment a dead duck, according to a blog post by Peter Robins, media and technology editor at rival UK newspaper the Guardian (&#8220;The paywall won&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the paying-members-only policy recently enacted by <em>The Times</em> in the UK reportedly has caused online readership to plummet 90 percent (see <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jul/20/times-paywall-readership" target="_blank">here</a>), it&#8217;s still too early to declare the experiment a dead duck, according to a blog <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2010/jul/20/paywalls-rupert-murdoch" target="_blank">post</a> by <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/peter-robins" target="_blank">Peter Robins</a>, media and technology editor at rival UK newspaper the <em>Guardian</em> (&#8220;The paywall won&#8217;t be built in a day&#8221; July 22, 2010).</p>
<p>Robins writes that it would be &#8220;very unwise&#8221; to conclude that <em>Times</em>&#8216; publisher Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s paywall has failed. As argument, he raises the analogy of another Murdoch publication behind a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay_wall" target="_blank">paywall</a>, the quite successful <em>Wall Street Journal</em>.</p>
<p>Excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Wall Street Journal acquired its million online subscribers by following a consistent strategy for a decade&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Robins cautiously predicts that a definitive answer about the success or failure of the <em>Times</em>&#8216; paywall (if continued) won&#8217;t emerge for six months or more.</p>
<p>Robins does omit mentioning that the <em>WSJ</em> is primarily a financial newspaper and &#8212; like the <em>Financial Times</em> that also operates successfully behind a paywall &#8212; has a select subscriber base that reportedly is quite willing to pay for the speciality of business and finance news (see <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/mar/31/charging-for-content-thetimes" target="_blank">here</a>).</p>
<p>Earlier post on Times&#8217; paywall <a href="http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/2167" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/2328/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online traffic growing for newspapers</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/140</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/140#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, some promising numbers for U.S. newspapers, according to Nielsen Online, as reported this week in Editor &#38; Publisher. The online audience rose more than 12 percent in the most recent quarter, compared to the same period last year, E&#38;P reports (&#8220;Newspaper Sites Gain Audience in Q2&#8243; by Jennifer Saba, July 29, 2008). More here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, some promising numbers for U.S. newspapers, according to <a href="http://nielsen-online.com/" target="_blank">Nielsen Online</a>, as reported this week in<em> <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/index.jsp" target="_blank">Editor &amp; Publisher</a></em>. The online audience rose more than 12 percent in the most recent quarter, compared to the same period last year, <em>E&amp;P</em> reports (&#8220;Newspaper Sites Gain Audience in Q2&#8243; by Jennifer Saba, July 29, 2008).</p>
<p>More <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003832612" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/140/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s killing off newspapers?</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/137</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/137#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a concise piece in The Nation online this week, journalism professor Eric Alterman, lists the series of mistakes some &#8220;clueless media moguls&#8221; are making that, rather than slowing the rapid slide of newspapers into extinction, are ensuring that the demise will happen (&#8220;I Read the News Today&#8230; Oh Boy&#8221; July 16, 2008). Alterman names [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a concise <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080804/alterman" target="_blank">piece</a> in <em>The Nation</em> online this week, journalism professor<a href="http://fora.tv/myfora/ericalterman" target="_blank"> Eric Alterman</a>, lists the series of mistakes some &#8220;clueless media moguls&#8221; are making that, rather than slowing the rapid slide of newspapers into extinction, are ensuring that the demise will happen (&#8220;I Read the News Today&#8230; Oh Boy&#8221; July 16, 2008).</p>
<p>Alterman names some of the bigger villains by name and itemizes errors.</p>
<p>Overall the picture Alterman paints isn&#8217;t pretty. Especially depressing is his conclusion that any good ideas to rescue newspapers so far haven&#8217;t appeared.</p>
<p>Sure makes me want to believe in that old saw, it&#8217;s always darkest before the dawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/137/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Umberto Eco and the late newspaper</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/128</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/128#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umberto Eco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not difficult to find a lot of discussion online and elsewhere these days about the current rapid decline of newspapers in the U.S. and elsewhere. It&#8217;s also not too difficult to find a lot of blame being tossed around at times in those discussions about who or what is at fault. Writing recently in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not difficult to find a lot of discussion online and elsewhere these days about the current rapid <a href="http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/91" target="_blank">decline</a> of newspapers in the U.S. and elsewhere. It&#8217;s also not too difficult to find a lot of blame being tossed around at times in those discussions about who or what is at fault.</p>
<p>Writing recently in his regular <a href="http://espresso.repubblica.it/dettaglio/Parlare-in-ritardo/2019947" target="_blank">column</a> for<em> L&#8217;espresso</em>, however, <a href="http://foreignremarks.com/pages/umberto_eco_and_the_curious_case_of_the_chinese_editor.html" target="_blank">Umberto Eco</a> says it&#8217;s not anyone&#8217;s fault, no more than the hole in the ozone is. The decline of newspapers is a result of our technological development, according to Eco, and it&#8217;s just a fact. But, he adds, it&#8217;s an embarrassing one (&#8220;<em>Parlare in ritardo&#8221; La Bustina di Minerva</em>, April 17, 2008). Note &#8211; in Italian only.</p>
<p>Describing what the newspaper has become these days, Eco writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Così il giornale diventa come una serata in famiglia, dove il nonno ripete per la milionesima volta la storia di quando aveva subito i bombardamenti, il babbo snocciola i suoi luoghi comuni sulla situazione economica, poi si parla un po&#8217; male del vicino notoriamente cornuto, o si commenta la trasmissione televisiva appena vista. Niente di male, anzi bellissima situazione di socializzazione, ma non era questa, all&#8217;inizio degli inizi, la funzione delle gazzette, finestre che di colpo e inopinatamente si spalancavano ogni mattina sull&#8217;imprevisto.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Translation, roughly: Just so the newspaper becomes like spending an evening with the family, where the grandfather repeats for the umpteenth time the story of when he was caught under a bombing attack, the father rattles off his usual opinions on the economic situation, then there is some mildly unkind talk about a neighbor who is notoriously being cheated on, or comments about a television program that was just watched. Nothing bad, on the contrary, a wonderful social situation but this wasn&#8217;t, at the very beginning, the function of the newspapers (which were) windows suddenly and unexpectedly thrown open each morning on the unforeseen.)</p>
<p>If this excerpt whets your appetite to read more Eco, I also found this reprint of an <a href="http://medievalnews.blogspot.com/2007/12/interview-with-umberto-eco.html" target="_blank">interview</a> (in English) he gave to a reporter in New York last December (Interview with Umberto Eco, &#8220;The Armani of Italian literature,&#8221; Umberto Eco talks to Ben Naparstek, Dec 8, 2007, The Sydney Morning Herald).</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Questo post in <a href="http://www.net-one.org/content/view/390/1/" target="_blank">italiano</a> (parziale)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/128/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you love newspapers, read this and&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/91</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/91#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weep, probably, judging by some conclusions in a series of articles beginning today in Advertising Age. Taking a look at the ongoing decline of newspapers, the report focuses on what&#8217;s being done to forestall collapse (&#8220;The Newspaper Death Watch&#8221; by Nat Ives, April 28, 2008). One expert quoted in the article predicts that newspapers will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weep, probably, judging by some conclusions in a <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=126685" target="_blank">series</a> of articles beginning today in <em>Advertising Age. </em>Taking a look at the ongoing decline of newspapers, the report focuses on what&#8217;s being done to forestall collapse (&#8220;The Newspaper Death Watch&#8221; by Nat Ives, April 28, 2008).</p>
<p>One expert quoted in the article predicts that newspapers will survive only about 20 to 25 more years:</p>
<blockquote><p>Of course, newspaper owners aren&#8217;t going to just give up and wait &#8212; and that&#8217;s why Ad Age is launching this series about the 1,437 dailies still working hard in the U.S. It&#8217;ll look at the thought leaders in the industry, their attempts to leave the past &#8212; and even formats &#8212; behind and their strategies for finding new business models.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Link to this story came from <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/" target="_blank">mediabistro.com</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/91/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net will climb to third place by 2010, they say</title>
		<link>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/14</link>
		<comments>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet will edge past magazines, now ranked third behind newspapers and television, as a favorite for advertisers by 2010, according to an article in the Guardian online yesterday (&#8220;Net to become third biggest ad medium,&#8221; by Mark Sweney, Guardian Unlimited, Dec 3, 2007) . The report on global advertising was just released by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet will edge past magazines, now ranked third behind newspapers and television, as a favorite for advertisers by 2010, according to an article in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/dec/03/advertising.internet" target="_blank"><em>Guardian</em></a> online yesterday (&#8220;Net to become third biggest ad medium,&#8221; by Mark Sweney, <em>Guardian Unlimited</em>, Dec 3, 2007) .</p>
<p>The report on global advertising was just released by the media agency ZenithOptimedia, according to the <em>Guardian</em> article, and it projects that by 2010, the Internet will lay claim to 11.5 percent ($61 billion) of the total global spending on advertising ($530 billion). For the same time period, the top two favorites for advertisers, newspapers and television, will have a 25.4 percent share and a 37.5 percent share respectively.</p>
<p>The Internet currently ranks behind radio on the list of advertising mediums, but is projected to surpass it next year, according to the newspaper article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foreignremarks.com/passingcomments/archives/14/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
